Posts tagged good on-goings-on?

The Left Hates America…Says the Neo-Secessionist


This
is exactly the kind of person that really pisses me off. In an unfortunate turn of events for my IQ, I came across his MySpace blog while doing a Google search for someone on the far-right with whom to have a rational debate. Not surprisingly, I suppose, such people don’t seem to exist: all of their blog pages seem to be exactly like this.

Does anyone else notice how the self-prolcaimed “patriot” — like many of his brethren — has the flag of the Confederacy in his background? Apparently there are more people than I’d care to believe who are stupid enough to think that one can be both a neo-secessionist and “pro-America”.

According to him and the rest of the far-right, the only way to prevent the “encroachment” of “inferior cultures” is through “intelligent and traditionalist conservative dialogue” (how many contradictions can you fit into one sentence, really?).

In his status updates, he claims that, “Obama = Lenin = Stalin = Hitler… What is that spook doing?” According to Godwin’s Law, he loses. At everything. Unfortunately for thinking people, it seems that it’s not just him who buys into this kind of whackjobbery perpetuated by right-wing pundits — like Limbaugh.

I could go in-depth about the not-at-all subtle differences between the Democratic Party (on the center-left) and Marxist-Leninism (on the far-left), and the differences and outright hatred between Communists and Nazis, but this douche is clearly a gigantic waste of time.

Read the rest of this entry »

Comments (1) »

This Lecture Brought to You by McDonald’s

Last year, I walked in to one of my classes about five minutes before class, got settled in, and waited for the professor to call the class to order and start teaching. He did the former, but he didn’t start the latter right away.

Instead, a representative from Kaplan — the standardized test corporation — was allowed to give a brief presentation about how awesome the Kaplan classes are (I think it was for the LSATs) and, while he did that, the TAs handed out Kaplan fliers.

Apparently, this wasn’t an isolated incident, either. A number of people I’ve talked to about this — as well as a reader who e-mailed us about this growing problem — have also experienced this invasion of our classrooms. You see, what I found eminently frustrating about this was not only that I was essentially part of a captive audience and that I had to deal with seeing even more advertising (I get more than enough living in NYC and on the internet, thanks): the money that I paid to take that class was being used to foist a product upon me.

But what was even more outrageous was the use of University employees (the TAs) to participate in the advertising. When I came to Columbia, I never expected the lifetime of debt to which I acquiesced to pay for the distribution of what I am sure the University administration would describe as “vital” “educational” “materials” or some nonsense. In all fairness to the TAs, however, I am sure they never expected to be the pack mules of Kaplan when they took the job.  Probably, it wasn’t even in the job description.

While the University administration might try to justify this obscenely obnoxious practice with the claim that they’re trying to keep the University above water by trying to raise more money, that claim is just laughable (for example, it’s been going on since before the economic crisis). While we’re being forced to pay to watch advertising from corporations such as Kaplan and RedBull (as our reader says), the Spec points out that the athletics department is still raking in millions and millions of dollars.

Keeping dorms open on the weekend (Wallach is now closed Friday through Sunday. Apparently it was also too costly to inform students about the change beforehand.) or our classrooms free from annoying advertisements? Apparently that’s just a luxury. But God forbid that we should cut our athletics spending or PrezBo’s ridiculous salary.

Leave a comment »

The War on Fun — Now National

This post originally appeared in the Columbia Spectator’s Commentariat.

Recently, one of my friends sent me a terrifying YouTube video. What was it? A Russia Today news report on what’s going down in the US regarding our copyright laws.

Apparently, the Obama administration is moving to criminalize illegal music downloading. While it may sound like this has already happened, this isn’t the case at all. In fact, while downloading copyrighted music is “illegal”, it has been almost entirely a civil matter. In legal terms, this means that organizations such as the RIAA have been free to go after whomever they catch downloading music, sue them for ridiculous amounts of money, and leave them a crying mess with no money left. Now, it seems that the US government wants to get in on the deal.

Of course, this shouldn’t come as any surprise to us — it wasn’t that long ago that the Obama administration publicly took the side of the RIAA in approving ridiculous monetary awards ($150,000 per song) in civil cases. That’s right, folks. If you downloaded one song from any major artist, the RIAA can sue you for your entire graduate education. Or, they can threaten you by suing you just enough for your family to sell their house and move to a cardboard box.

Oh, and Vice-President Biden hasn’t exactly had a wonderful record on net neutrality, file-sharing, or even online privacy either. According to the afore-linked article, Vice-President Biden has been “anti-encryption” (because, as the article asserts, encryption makes it hard for the FBI to read your e-mail), and supported making it a felony for playing an illegal version of a game. In other words, if Vice-President Biden had had his way, if your younger brother has played your illegally-downloaded version of Starcraft, he won’t get to vote when he turns 18. Awesome, right?

To be fair, I’m still looking into some of these things further. I haven’t be able to find anything to confirm the Russia Today story, so it may have been a hoax or perhaps simply some bad publicity being put out by the Russian government about the US (something that hasn’t been entirely unknown to happen).

If there’s anyone else who has some additional information about what’s going on in the ever-expanding and ever-more-complicated world of copyright law (which also seems to become more and more relevant to the lives of college students everywhere by the day), please let me know so I can check it out.

Leave a comment »

Stuff that pisses me off

1. I like vanilla ice-cream, plain pizza, and cheeseburgers; that doesn’t mean I’m a boring person.  For some reason, people have come to associate consumption with a person’s personality. Needless to say, this is an absolutely ridiculous assumption to make. The recent (as in, within the past few decades) societal shift towards a fascination with consumption has today translated into a judgement of personality based on what people buy. And, yes, while clothes might tend to indicate a general affiliation with one subculture or another (for example, lots of money spent at Abercrombie & Fitch might indicate that a person is either a gigantic tool or a homosexual) the same cannot be said for other areas of consumption — yet. Making personality assumptions about people based on what they eat goes even beyond this and quite frankly annoying.

Just because you like Indian food or became a vegan and prefer fake bleu cheese that looks more like cement than anything else doesn’t mean that I’m a less interesting person than you are. It just means I’m easy to please.

2. People who like food only because it is exotic are not exotic themselves; rather, they are pretentious and annoying. On university campuses everywhere, people have become afraid to like what they actually like. People who admit to liking things like plain pizza, burgers, or regular Chinese food are frequently looked down upon as boring. People who admit to having enjoyed reading any Western, white, and/or male author are presumed to be lacking in analytical capacity or racist/misogynist/something offensive.

Some people enjoy eating raw fish; some people enjoy eating Ethiopian food; some people like Korean food. If you actually enjoy it, that’s great. I’m very happy for you. But if you’re only eating it because you want people to think that you’re really cool or adventurous or unique and fun — I have something to tell you: you don’t come off as any of those things. People can tell when you’re faking it — usually, your pretension is characterized by excessive talking about how much you love [insert "exotic" food here], how much you’re looking forward to eating [insert "exotic" food here], or how much you love restaurant that serves [insert "exotic" food here].

3. Your cynicism doesn’t make you interesting. The fact that you hate everything doesn’t make you a more interesting person or a more fun person to be around; being a douche to everyone, actually, is a sure-fire way to alienate people. (And, yes, I realize the irony of this statement). 

Leave a comment »

From Douchebags to Teabags

Conservatives voicing their “full-throated” opposition to government spending (which apparently didn’t bother them during the Bush administration) in an attempt to “lick” big government.

Some are going “nuts” for it and they “whipped out” the festivities earlier this week. They want to give Obama a “tongue-lashing”.

Wow. 

Oh, and a fun fact? Apparently, taxes for the rich were 10% higher under the Reagan administration.

Leave a comment »

Moving On for a Bit

Alrighty folks. I’m moving on to the Commentariat full-time for a while. I know I make a lot of promises about updating that I don’t usually follow through on, but I will eventually come back to the Motherland.

I encourage you all to keep up with me there, and keep checking back here, because I might update every once in a while.

Best!

Leave a comment »

Yes We Can; But So Could They

This about summarizes how I feel about the whole gay thing.

This about summarizes how I, as a religious person, feel about the whole gay thing. Click the image for a larger version.

This piece ran in the Commentariat, the Spectator opinion blog.

Last night, when I found out Barack Obama had won, I was ecstatic. I ran out of my dorm with my friends and we, and probably 200 other Columbia students, marched up to Harlem to watch the last few minutes of Obama’s speech.

But when I got back to my computer and television, I was horribly disappointed. The ban on gay marriage in Florida had passed, the ban on gay marriage in Arizona had passed, the ban on gay marriage in California had passed, and the ban on gay adoption in Arkansas had passed. Al Franken looked like he was going to lose to Norm Coleman, and convicted felon Ted Stevens was ahead by three points in Alaska (my friend has vowed to start donating to the Alaskan Independence Party so that incubator of corrupt and incompetant politicians will leave us alone and take their two corrupt Republican senators with them).

I know I should be happy. My friends keep telling me that Barack Obama will be good for gay people. And “at least it’s not McCain”. And yet, for the past eight years — for nearly half of my lifetime — my countrymen have been voting to stop me from having equal rights.

Read the rest of this entry »

Comments (1) »

I HAZ AN INTERNET

In 2004, massive internet (and with it, youth) support made Howard Dean seem to be almost undefeatable. This, of course, fell through, but the end of the Dean campaign didn’t spell the end of internet organizing.

For the 2008 primaries, Barack Obama (now the Democratic nominee, for those of you living under a rock), raised a record $32 million—just in January (http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/obama-sets-record-with-january-donations-online-donations-88-of-total/)! Of that, $28 million (nearly 88%) came from online donations.

In the Republican race, Ron Paul raised $4 million in individual internet donations on one day, setting yet another record (http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/raasch/2007-11-08-raasch_N.htm). Yeah, he didn’t win, but, um, that’s a lot of money, especially for the Republican Dennis Kucinich.

As the role of the internet in politics grows greater and greater, so, too, do the number of people and organizations who come up with fun, frightening, creative, or just plain weird ways of supporting their candidate.

Here’s a collection of some of those ridiculous things I’ve found.

1. “I’ve Got a Crush on [Candidate]”

While most people have heard of Obama Girl, some may be surprised (and amused) to hear that she inspired quite a few imitators, including Hillary Boy (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLSWudoqtWE) and, of course the song I’ve Got a Crush on My VP (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpESyx58qmA). There used to be something along the lines of I’ve Got a Crush on Huckabee, but it seems that YouTube removed it. Alas.

2. The Chuck Norris Ad (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDUQW8LUMs8)

This ad has been widely credited with the success that the Huckabee campaign had. It seems, however, despite Chuck Norris telling America “how it’s gonna be”, we just weren’t ready for a President who wanted to quarantine everyone who is HIV-positive.

3. The Great Schlep (http://www.thegreatschlep.com/site/index.html)

It seems like the Jewish people have yet to jump on the Blame-Nader-for-2000 bandwagon, because this time some of us are doing our utmost to make it up to America. Sarah Silverman, starring is a marginally-funny-yet-possibly-very-offensive-but-to-black-people-not-Jews-so-it’s-totally-not-okay video, threatens to “blame the Jews” if Barack Obama doesn’t win the election (she’s Jewish so it’s totally okay). She urges young American Jews to go visit their grandparents in Florida (a swing state, again) and convince them to vote for Obama. And she invents the word “douchenozzle”.

4. The Barack Obama Youth (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2SmfJ_zIFM)

So this is, quite frankly, one of the most terrifying things I’ve seen in a while. I’m sure they don’t mean to scare me, but my heart can’t help but to skip a beat when I see people in military uniforms. Marching around. Making funny gestures with their arms. Shouting at me about the policies of a leader. A leader who they really really like. Also, they spelled “Barack” wrong. Oops.

5. The 7-Eleven Election (http://www.7-election.com/)

Apparently (I haven’t been to a 7-Eleven since this past summer) 7-Eleven has decided to be a good corporate citizen and conduct a national poll. You vote for either Barack Obama or John McCain (because there aren’t any other candidates running, duh) by buying a cup of coffee with your preferred candidate’s name on it. Somehow, the corporation keeps track of how many of each candidate’s cups have been bought, and they put the results in a big colorful map on the internet. Nationally, Obama leads by about 6 points (this correlates with actual polling data). In Texas, Obama leads by 8 points (this doesn’t correlate with actual polling data). In conclusion, it’s probably not very accurate, but it’s interesting to see.

6. MyDebates (http://www.myspace.com/mydebates)

MySpace partnered up with some other corporation to create MyDebates. The website has a streaming video feed of the presidential debates, surveys, and lots of fun data to look at. The userbase is obviously biased (Barack Obama: 57%; John McCain: 24%), but that’s not my biggest issue with website. Not only does it pretend that Obama and McCain are the only two candidates in the race, but the choices for its survey questions are ridiculous. For example, on the same-sex marriage issue, the choices are:

  • “Support the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as the legal union between one man and one woman. Do not take a position on civil unions for same-sex couples.”
  • “Repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as the legal union between one man and one woman. Support civil unions for same-sex couples.”
  • “Neither”
  • “I haven’t decided yet”

I hope I don’t have to explain what’s wrong with this, but I’ll do so anyway. First, it makes it appear as if there are only two legitimate positions to hold on the issue. Second, while the option “Neither” is presented, selecting that renders one’s opinion entirely invalid, because one could disagree and hold either a position on the far-left or the far-right. Third, the issue of same-sex marriage is complicated, and can’t be boiled down to support or opposition to the Defense of Marriage Act (which, by the way, is unconstitutional thrice over – the 14th Amendment, the Privileges and Immunities Clause, and the Full Faith and Credit Clause). Lastly, of course, is the most obvious problem: the policy choices for “same-sex marriage” don’t actually list “same-sex marriage” as an option. Oops. Thanks, MySpace.

Or let’s take the issue of immigration:

  • “Secure the country’s borders immediately before considering additional policy reform”
  • “We should not act hastily. Border security is only effective if used in conjunction with broader policy reform.”

These options are, of course, meaningless. “broader policy reform” could mean anything from cutting off legal immigration entirely and building a giant wall around the US to getting rid of all barriers to immigration and granting amnesty to everyone. Perhaps these options, of course, are simply reflective of the positions of the candidates (i.e. purposefully vague). Yet anyone who actually goes to Obama’s website and reads the blurb he has about immigration could learn way more way faster. And, of course, God forbid there should be any options besides the ones that are radically centrist.

7. Nailin’ Palin

I heard a rumor about this – supposedly a porn being made about Sarah Palin – and then accidentally ran across the website. I closed it in horror (there is a picture of two people having sex with Palin’s, and, yes, McCain’s heads obviously photoshopped on). I can’t find it again. The McCain campaign probably issued a cease-and-desist, and rightly so. Really, you don’t want to see it.

Comments (2) »